One row-state discipline, three surfaces
CLIO
Computational legal intelligence: AI-related legal and administrative decisions as evidence packages, not flat citations.
- 6 seed decision packages, tiered by anchor granularity
- Per-package manuscript & quotation gates
- Europe-first; no doctrinal-finality claim
NOMAD
Normative-diff observatory: change in public AI-governance texts must be segment-pair evidence, not a loose "the policy changed".
- 8 seeded source families; 9 publication units
- 4-level evidence-readiness ladder
- Blocked rows kept visible, not hidden
Temporal Commons
Regulatory-lag observatory: incident-to-response timing with date-role typing; causal language defaults to not-claimed.
- Date roles never treated as interchangeable
- 9-row governed export with lag-quality classes
- No causation or representative-lag claim
Six decisions, tiered by what each can support
| Decision | Jurisdiction | Anchor tier | Current use |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCHUFA | EU / Germany | green · paragraph-pinned | matrix-ready after wording review |
| PNR / Ligue des droits humains | EU / Belgium | green · paragraph-pinned | matrix-ready after wording review |
| SyRI | Netherlands | amber · mixed canonical/window | illustration only; language + quotation review open |
| Conseil constitutionnel 2018-765 DC | France | staged · single-row | branch candidate; interpretation review |
| Bridges | England & Wales | preview only | governance-record caution; source verification |
| Garante Clearview | Italy | regulator-facet | operative-anchor + translation review |
A row is promoted only when its gate closes
1 · VisiblePublic and captured. Gate: assign a source family.
2 · Source-family codedHas a provenance class & proof ceiling. Gate: type its dates.
3 · Date-role codedDates carry roles & lag-quality. Gate: establish a pair or anchor.
4 · Claim-support linkedSegment pair or decision anchor exists. Gate: resolve language & quotation.
5 · Quote/denominator readyCan be quoted or counted — within its own denominator only.
This observatory reports evidence readiness, not legal conclusions. It makes no claim of legal truth, doctrinal synthesis, operative legal effect, causation, representative regulatory lag, jurisdiction performance, prevalence, compliance, or legal-corpus completeness. Non-English material is gated: machine-translation-only text never supports a legal conclusion. Counts are attributed to their owning observatory and never fused.